BACKGROUNDER

 

 

Introduction

 

The Silverlands Action Campaign group was formed in October 2001 to oppose a Home Office decision (now under review) to re-locate a treatment centre from its current site (Wolvercote Clinic, Horton Hospital) in Epsom, Surrey to (Silverlands, Holloway Hill) Chertsey, Surrey.

 

The Silverlands Action Campaign accepts the need for the prevention of child sex abuse and does not condone the need for this type of facility.  However, an institution [housing and] treating persons who are by their very nature a serious danger to children should not be opened in a location so heavily populated by children.  We do not believe any community in a democratic country should have a facility like this planned and implemented in secrecy without any consultation with the community and their elected representatives. 

 

The Silverlands Action Campaign is a community group with no party political affiliations.

 

 

History in Chronological Order

 

May 11th 2001: Home Secretary Jack Straw, his deputy, Paul Boateng, and junior health minister Gisela Stuart agree to a civil servants’ recommendation that the Wolvercote Clinic for convicted paedophiles be transferred from Epsom to Chertsey.

 

July 2001: Home Office and Probation Services have secret talks with Surrey Police to discuss the proposed plans to re-locate the paedophile clinic.

 

Mid-August 2001: Runnymede Council chief executive Tim Williams was ‘stunned’ in a telephone conversation with National Probation Services official Carole Kellas to learn Silverlands had been chosen as a site for the Wolvercote Clinic.  He was told the patients would be men with ‘behavioural problems’.  Mr. Williams was bound by confidentiality.

 

Early October 2001: Local resident informs Surrey Herald that he was worried about a barbed wire fence being erected around Silverlands, a grade II listed building owned by the department of Health.  He discovered that the owners had not applied for planning permission.

 

October 12th 2001: Mr. Philip Hammond, MP for Runnymede and Weybridge was not briefed by the Home Office and found out about the plans only when local newspaper, the Surrey Herald, called him for his reaction.

 


October 15th 2001: Surrey Herald journalist contacts the Home Office and left a list of questions for the chief press officer, George Burrow.  More than four hours later the Home Office contacted the local paper confirming that Silverlands was a proposed site for the clinic, but that work on Silverlands to convert it into a clinic had been suspended pending a review.

 

October 15th 2001: When the confirmation of the news was conveyed to Runnymede Council, embarrassed chief executive Tim Williams admitted they had been gagged for weeks.

 

October 18th 2001: The story broke in the Surrey Herald alerting local residents to the Home Office proposals.

 

October 21st 2001: More than 250 local Chertsey residents crowded into a local Village Hall to protest at the relocation of the clinic. 

 

October 22nd 2001: The Silverlands Action Campaign was formed by a number of local residents.  www.silverlandsgroup.org

 

October 25th 2001: Runnymede Council Meeting.  Protesters packing the public gallery at the Civic Offices, Addlestone, hear councillors unanimously condemn the Home Office proposals.

 

October 26th 2001: Silverlands Action Campaign group hold the first candlelit vigil outside Silverlands.  More than 300 protesters supported the campaign efforts that evening in the rain.  The BBC News Room London covered the all day protest, including the evening vigil. 

 

Every Friday 5pm – 7pm: The candlelit vigil is held every Friday outside Silverlands from 5pm-7pm.

 

October 31st 2001: Beverley Hughes, Home Office junior minister left with the political hot potato in her lap, visited the site for the first time with a 20-strong police and Special Branch protection team.  She denied a Whitehall cover up but admits Silverlands “could have been handled better”.  Beverly Hughes confirmed that the Home Office will spend £2 million pounds of tax payers money to convert the Silverlands building.

 

November 7th 2001: Planning application, which made no mention of paedophile treatment centre was tactfully withdrawn by Mr. Milburn, Health Secretary from the Runnymede planning committee.  The withdrawn application said Mr. Milburn’s department wanted to “convert Silverlands to a psychiatric in-patient residential clinic”.

 

Planning officers from Runnymede were recommending refusal on the grounds that the proposed alterations “would adversely affect the historic fabric, character and interest of the listed building and harm its setting.

 

The Home Office continues the work to convert Silverlands.

 

November 13th 2001: Tony Raban, head of the [Silverlands] review committee1 on behalf of the Home Office, requests a series of individual meetings with representatives from the following local groups: Silverlands Action Campaign, Schools, local MP Philip Hammond, Faith groups, local Health Trust and Runnymede Councillors.  Mr. Raban declares that the objective of these meetings is for his review committee to enter into a dialogue, as part of the review process, to answer our questions, hear our main concerns, listen to our suggestions, sort out any misconceptions held by individuals.

 

November 27th, 2001: Home Office release a suitability criteria document which was used by the Home Office when selecting Silverlands as the new home for the Wolvercote clinic.

 

Friday 30th November: Silverlands Action Campaign presents a petition with
more than 3000 names to 10 Downing Street.

 

December 18th 2001: Philip Hammond MP held an adjournment debate with the Home Office Minister Beverley Hughes.  Philip Hammond was supported in the debate by Andrew MacKinlay, the Labour MP for Thurrock, a former pupil at Salesian School.  Key points from the debate include: 1) PH requested that data underpinning the final decision and the locations considered should be published for scrutiny.  2) PH sought assurance that work on the building was just repairs to the fabric of the building.

 

7th February, 2002: Philip Hammond meets with Tony Raban and Eithne Wallis from the Home Office to discuss the decision making process.  Key points from the meeting include: 1) Home Office confirm that they are now only weeks away from a decision. 2) If Silverlands is selected then the Home Office agreed to fully comply with all planning and listed building consents. 3) Home Office would make no commitments as to what information on their decision making process they would make public.

 

The Home Office Selection Criteria

 

1.      The Silverlands Action Campaign were not informed until 27th November, 2001 what criteria the Home Office used when selecting Silverlands.   A copy of the suitability document can be obtained via the Silverlands Action Campaign website at www.silverlandsgroup.org

 

Home Office Risk Assessment

 

The Home Office is unable to outline what risk assessment, if any, has been conducted  In fact, in an information paper sent to local Councillors by the National Probation Services[NPS] outlining the work of the Lucy Faithfull Foundation [at Wolvercote Clinic], the NPS feel that “any potential risk is minimised” to the local area [Silverlands].  They outline that “a typical resident” will be a parent, stepparent, uncle, neighbour, church leader, teacher or sports coach to the child victim”.  They also say that a minority of ‘residents’ will be convicted of possession or distribution of child pornography on the Internet or of committing offences against children unknown to them, ie. predatory paedophile.

 

What they [NPS] neglected to say in their document was that in late 2000, a Wolvercote ‘resident’ paedophile sparked a police search when he absconded from Wolvercote.  The paedophile, John McCormack, who has been convicted of numerous sex offences against children, was being treated at the Wolvercote clinic.  Police say that he was eventually picked up at a hostel in Birmingham.  McCormack was originally released from prison on license on condition he followed the Wolvercote treatment programme.

 

The Home Office decision directly contravenes Government policy that communities and individuals have a right to be consulted when decisions are being considered which affect those communities.

 

 

Why the Silverlands Action Campaign believe Silverlands to be an Inappropriate Location?

 

·          Silverlands is a family area surrounded by built up communities

·          The proposed Paedophile clinic (Silverlands) is surrounded by over 23 schools within 2.5 miles (see enclosed local map). 

·          The nearest school is an infant school, which is only a 5 minute walk from the proposed centre. 

·          The proposed site backs onto St. Peter’s hospital that is home to a number of children’s wards, crèches and nurseries

·          The site backs onto the Abraham Cowley unit – a psychiatric unit for the rehabilitation of teenagers and adults abused as children

·          Within a 2 mile radius are many parks and playgrounds surrounded by woodland

·          One of the UK’s largest children’s theme parks, Thorpe Park, is 2 miles from the proposed site

·          St. Peter’s hospital, Chertsey, is 20% understaffed and are recruiting staff from the Philippines.  Medical staff find it difficult securing affordable accommodation in the area.

·          Silverlands grounds are overlooked by a residential home.  Home to a single parent family with one young boy.

·          Police are understaffed.

 

 

About the Existing Wolvercote Clinic2

 

·          The unit houses 25 paedophiles for approximately one year at a time.

·          They are free to leave the site if accompanied by a member of staff (not by the police)

·          280 paedophiles have been treated so far at the Epsom unit.

·          40 have re-offended.

·          6 have absconded.

·          Some patients go for treatment on probation licence.

 

 

Contact the Silverlands Action Campaign on:

www.silverlandsgroup.org

email: silverlandsgroup@hotmail.com

 

 



1 Eithne Wallis, head of National Probation Services, is also part of the review committee.  Ms. Wallis was part of the original decision making team.  Effectively, Ms. Wallis is reviewing her own decision.

2 Information supplied by the National Probation Service.